AI can generate routine and templated news, but original reporting, sourcing, investigation, and accountability are exactly what AI cannot do, and what real journalism is.
That 65/100 is the average. What's your number?
Your real risk depends on what you actually do all day, not your job title. Answer 20 quick questions to get your personal 1–100 score, the tasks AI reaches first, and a plan to stay ahead.
Get my personal risk score →Will AI replace journalists? The short answer
Honest answer, and you of all people value those. Will AI replace journalists? The templated, aggregated, rewrite-the-press-release end, yes, I generate that now, and the content farms have already noticed. But original investigation, sources who trust you, and the accountability for getting it right, that's exactly what I can't do, and it's the part that actually deserves the name journalism. Let me lay out the split.
Here's the part that matters underneath the noise: AI replaces tasks more often than whole jobs. On Moroporo's task-based assessment, journalists score 65 out of 100 for AI exposure (1 = most resilient, 100 = most automatable), which lands in the elevated exposure range, driven mostly by creativity & judgment. It's a directional estimate, not a prophecy, your own number depends on what you actually do.
What journalists do that AI can take, and what it can't
Here's the line, clearly. Templated news, earnings write-ups, aggregation, basic recaps, SEO filler, I produce that fast and without complaint. But original investigation, source relationships, verifying facts and being accountable for them, editorial judgment, on-the-ground reporting, that's human work I structurally cannot do, I have no sources and no spine. Here's the split:
▸ Exposed to AI
- Templated news and earnings write-ups
- Routine aggregation and rewrites
- Basic summaries of press releases
- Standard sports and data recaps
- SEO-driven filler content
✓ Safer from AI
- Original investigation and reporting
- Source relationships and access
- Verifying and being accountable for facts
- Narrative and editorial judgment
- On-the-ground and interview-based work
What this means if you're a journalist
Straight: routine and templated journalism is exposed to me, and that low-end work is being automated now. But investigative, source-driven, accountable reporting is exactly what I can't do, and arguably more valuable as I flood the zone with generated content nobody can fully trust. The exposed slice is the commodity content. The safe core is real journalism, the kind that needs a human who can be held responsible for the truth. I can rewrite a press release. I cannot break a story.
Will AI replace journalists soon? What's actually happening
What's actually happening: AI generates templated news, recaps, and aggregation, and that low-end work is being automated now. But original investigation, source relationships, and accountable reporting are exactly what AI cannot do, and arguably more valuable as AI-generated content floods the zone. The exposed slice is the commodity content; the safe core is real journalism.
The 65/100 is the average. What's yours?
But 65 is the average, and an investigative role is a different number from an aggregation one. Take the test, four minutes, and I'll tell you exactly where you stand and the fastest move toward the reporting I can't replicate. Better you know than guess.
Get my personal risk score →Built on the same task-based framework used in major automation research. No signup, no spam, just your number and a plan.
How we score AI risk for journalists
The exposure score comes from a task-based framework, the same approach used in major automation research, which measures five dimensions: how routine and structured the work is, how much it happens in the physical world, how much it depends on human connection and trust, how much novel creativity and judgment it requires, and how much trust and accountability a human must carry. Journalists score where they do largely because of creativity & judgment. See the full methodology and score your own role →